We’ve been contacted by ‘A N Onymous’, who has been a frequent contributor to TheTruthAboutSolitaire and wanted to share their opinion of Peverel, as it is now over a year since they ‘took’ over Solitaire Property Management and their view is that nothing has changed.  (one that many of us would also agree with)

‘A N Onymous’ addressed their message to us ‘One Year of PeverHell’ and below is the correspondence, they’ve asked us to post, that highlights their problems.

“My customer reference/account number 00157/001060.

My lease document tells me that Solitaire are responsible for the management and maintenance of the development where I live.  In return we, the residents are required to pay them a management fee.  Since 1999 this fee has more than doubled yet the standards of management and maintenance remain abysmal.

Andy from Solitaire/Peverel has informed me that the Regional Property Manager completed a site inspection on the 15th July 09.  From time to time I take photographs of the development and indeed I took some on the 23rd July 09 just eight days after the inspection.  Here they are:

Anonymous' Image 1

Anonymous' Image 1

Anonymous Image 2

Anonymous' Image 2

Anonymous Image 3

Anonymous' Image 3

The bin store gates depicted in the photo have been dropping off one by one over several years as a result of rusty hinges. The post you see sticking out of the ground with its sign missing is one of several and they have been like this for as long as I can remember – another one fell off last week as a result of rotting wood.  The weeds you see growing out of the guttering are only the latest – we have had much, much worse.

I have had a wander around the development today (17th October) and the problems depicted in the photographs of 23rd July have still not been attended to, three months after a Solitaire/Peverel ’inspection’.

I have often wondered whether Solitaire/Peverel managers actually ever visit the developments for which they are responsible or, do they visit and simply ignore glaringly obvious maintenance issues such as these.  It seems to be the latter.

The Peverel Property Management website says; ‘Our core focus is delivering excellent levels of service to our clients’. These photographs seem to contradict this nonsense and are clear evidence that nothing has improved one year after the Peverel takeover. 

I would like Andy to address the following points.

1.Why did the Regional Property Manager fail to attend to the glaringly obvious maintenance issues illustrated in the above photographs after the site inspection of 15th July 09 ?

2.Solitaire/Peverel have been paid to manage this development yet they have failed to do so properly.  As a gesture of goodwill to the residents here do you think it right that at least some of the management fee be refunded ?

If any visitors to TheTruthAboutSolitaire have issues that are still yet to be addressed, feel free to e-mail us, attaching photo’s and your experiences.  We’ll then bring your case to the attention of everyone in an attempt to get Solitaire / Peverel to sort your problems.