All Peverel Companies Are The Same
Today, we are obviously highlighting the issues with the Peverel Retirement Home side of the Consensus Business Group, following the BBC Breakfast report.
However, it’s not just Peverel Retirement Home owners that are being ripped off or ignored by ‘Peverel’ herein.
We’ve been contacted by ‘Laurie’ who has asked us to publish there experiences and issues with PeverelOM – although it is PeverelOM – they are all part of the Peverel Group.
Peverel OM Ltd
Marlborough House
Wigmore Place
Wigmore Lane
Luton
Bedfordshire
LU2 9EXPA to the Managing Director
FORMAL COMPLAINT3rd November 2009
Dear Sir/Madame,
It is with regret that I am contacting you in order to make a complaint about the service I am receiving from PeverelOM regarding my property. I have previously contacted the Manager of the property in writing, on the telephone and via numerous emails as per the recommendations laid out in you complaints procedure leaflet.
My complaint has many aspects, but to summarise, I feel that I am paying an extortionate amount of money for a service that I am yet to see any benefit of. I get very little response to any requests made, and I also feel your company has broken some fundamental laws (punishable by fine) which are stated in the Landlord and Tennant Act.
I moved into my flat in July 2008 and started to pay my maintenance fees from that very first month as this was what I was instructed to do. At this stage the development was just being completed, in fact the developers were still present on site when moving in. I then found out that PeverelOM did not take over ownership of the site until mid October time. Therefore I was paying your company for no service at all; I still have seen no sign of a rebate on these monies, even though I have asked, in now over 18 months.
After 1 year of paying my management fees I received my yearly summary letter stating what I had paid so far and what the new schedules for the next financial year were going to be. I was shocked to see no sign of rebate details and an increase of 9% on the management fees for the next year! I immediately called up the customer service centre and enquired when I should expect my rebate and why the prices had increased. I was bluntly told that no rebate would probably happen and I would not be informed of any such decision until the accounts had been audited. Now I am not an accountant but I do know that auditing accounts should not make any difference on how your company manages the funds and how your company estimates your next year’s charges, auditing is simply for tax accounting purposes. As it stands your system seems to wait 6 months for auditing to occur and then to adjust the charges, but by that point you have already been billing the new rate for 6 months! It is ridiculous that you are not basing your pricing on your current outgoings. A large company like yourself should easily know what the rate of expenditure is, long before you audit your accounts.
My complaint also lies with what has been happening on site. When your company signed off the site as satisfactory, I am not sure who carried this audit out, but they did not do a good job. Your company signed over control to a site that was in no way complete and have passed this burden over to the residents who are now paying to correct mistakes that should have been spotted by your staff and informed the developer to complete. A good example is the internal finishing which were damaged during carpet fitting and the external landscaping and parking. The landscaping is absolutely shocking and still contains large amounts of building rubble. Despite many conversations with the PM about this and explaining to him that it should never have been taken over in the state it was, we are now still being billed with 3 day “intensive work” periods to fix it.
As I was not happy with my management costs I have written to the PM asking for proofs of expenditure and invoices for the period of July 2008 to May 2009 which I am entitled to do by law, after receiving a summary letter from you for that period. The PM had one month to provide this to me. After 6 weeks I called to ask why it had not been done and was simply given the same rubbish about audited accounts. After pointing the customer services to the laws outlined in the Landlord and Tennant Act I was then provided with this information.
Now imagine my surprise when inspecting these invoices that most do not even seem to apply to my building costs, and are certainly not estate costs. Loads of them are wasted callouts costing large amounts of money (such as people not having access due to PecverelOM changing the locks). There are also some alarming invoices stating clearly that some cleaning work on the sewage pumps is required, yet there are no invoices showing that this work was ever carried out. I also went ahead and made some quick calculations on the set of invoices. I calculated the total invoices cost and split it amongst the flats, then adding the appropriate sink fund charges and administrative charges as outlined in your documentation. My outcome was less than half the amount you are charging me!
I have brought all of these points to the attention of the PM and to your service support staff. Most of the time I get useless answers, excuses of emails not getting through or false promises of answers by the end of the working week. I am yet to receive any satisfactory answers and I have attached all the email chains at the end of this letter.
Moving on to the actual “service” we are being given. I have read extensively through my lease documentation which outlines the responsibilities of the management company. My lease, your website (Avenue), your welcome pack and your staff do not even have an up to date plan listing my building and the responsibility areas. There are no landscaping plans, nothing! How are you managing my building without these? The landscapers who attend are supposed to sweep bi-weekly in summer and monthly in winter. I can 100% guarantee that not a single person has swept the parking and concreted areas of my building for 18 months. In fact if you would like to come and inspect it you can still see the original building waste and rubble present along most of the building. Litter picking had not occurred until I kicked up a fuss about it, and then I got an earful from the landscaping company for complaining about them. Why should it be up to me to lodge these complaints? Please provide me with information on your exact responsibilities at my property as none of your staff seem to have these details anywhere. Surely you must have some signed documentation detailing what you are responsible for and a management plan diagram to show the areas covered?
The lift within the building is faulty more than it is not. Quite honestly I think that it is a defective unit and I have witnessed about 4 repairs within its first 12 months. All of the repairs have been invoiced and are therefore at a cost to me. Surely there are warranties and guarantees on these products, and why do you not have an annual invoice for maintenance? All the invoices seem to be individual callouts.
The only work that I currently see (and have ever seen) take place at my property are bi-weekly cleaning and hoovering of the internal corridors, the occasional visit by the “landscapers” to “tidy” (This has recently improved to bi-weekly after 12 months of my complaint, but they still do not do a full job) and regular lift repairs. Now I paid you £120 per month for 12 months, and now pay £137 a month (for the past 5 months) and all I have received is the above and a whole load of phone bills to your customer support line. I feel that you are completely ripping me off for a non existent service and find your back office workings both slow and quite honestly useless. Please explain what you are doing with my money!
In accordance with your governing body, ARMA’s advice, this is now the last step in your internal complaints procedure and my next step would be to report you to ARMA for failing to provide satisfactory information within a reasonable time, for failing to provide satisfactory evidence of expenditure within one month of written request, for failing to bill me at a fair and reasonable rate. I am very interested in hearing how you justify a 9% service charge increase when the previous year obviously has not cost as much as charged, let alone the fact that inflation is negative and we are in a recession! Obviously I will await your response to this letter and also for my end of year statement (due this month for money I paid 18 months ago!) before I progress any further, but unfortunately I am at my wits end with your company and with the amount of money I am paying you. I also urge you to “Google” your company name and see how many people have bad things to say about you. Not surprisingly most of them seem to be saying the same thing as in this letter.
Kind Regards,
Laurie
Laurie, also provided us with an e-mail trail that had been sent to their Property Manager for this development – yet nothing is being done.
The above is an all to familar story of how the Peverel Group treat their customers and those regular visitors to TheTruthAboutSolitaire, will not have been surprised to have read the above.
Peverel’s Online Feedback Manager – Andy, will reply to this post asking for Laurie to e-mail him direct and advising that he’ll forward it onto the property manager in question.
However, we are all becoming tired of ‘Andy’ using this site as a tool to make it appear that they are helping people, because they only want to help people who complain publicly and are ignoring those of us that e-mail them wanting answers.
I recommend that those people that have a problem with Peverel, ring them today and see what the response is that you get, and then let us know how you get on. We’re confident that you’ll get 1st class service and if not – well, that just proves that they aren’t bothered!
If anyone that has a complaint they’d like us to promote, please e-mail us.




November 19th, 2009 at 5:03 pm
Laurie
May I suggest you e mail a copie of this to your local M.P and inform him of the issues. Then ask him to pass this on to Gordon Banks M.P, Secretay for the “All Party Parliamentary Group” investigating the role of managing agents.
Anyone with an issue with Solitaire should also do this.
Good luck
November 19th, 2009 at 10:43 pm
Wow – getting busy around here – it’ll be standing room only soon! It’s having an effect: I see that this website has been set up http://www.solitairecustomerfeedback.co.uk/ (“Our objective is to provide the owners and residents of the developments that we manage with an efficient and effective service. Recent online activity has suggested that this is not always the case”). That’s an understatement!
Why are we so upset? For me, I will spend money with companies that “do the right thing”. Peverel in its various guises don’t on any level. You only have to hear the comments by Ian Rapley of Consensus Business Group on BBC today to know they only see tenants as a waste of time – but useful sources of money. What on earth do they say when the cameras are switched off?! Unbelievable.
I received a demand (in strong language) for a “licence” to let out our flat at a cost of £150 or £300. The lease says a) I don’t need a licence; and b) states a charge of £30+VAT. £150 is a 400% increase in less than 10 years. A Google search shows Peverel et al are repeatedly taken to Leasehold Valuation Tribunals – and lose – but do not stop making these demands.
I then thought about things more:
1. Fees increase year-on-year above inflation
2. Invoices are late (and rebranding Solitaire into something different has made things worse, not better)
3. Invariably there is a “balancing charge” long after the financial year closes – and you’ve guessed it, they want even more money
4. Requests to customer “services” are not actioned.
5. Other blogs refer to kickbacks various parts of the Consensus Group apparently receive
I am now talking to alternative management companies (ideally members of RICS, a *professional* body) about Right To Manage. I would recommend other people to:
- read and understand your lease
- tell Consumer Direct/ OFT about problems you’ve had
- write to Ed Davey MP, who seems already to have a bulging Peverel/ Solitaire/ E&M … postbag.
We need to keep the pressure up – we’re obviously having an effect.
November 19th, 2009 at 11:00 pm
… and you can do something else that’ll make a difference: sign the petition here: http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/flatownerhelp/ (the aim of which is to \petition the Prime Minister to create a body which will oversee and regulate the leasehold management industry, enforce a proper code of conduct offering protection to owners of leasehold properties from unreasonable service charges and poor quality of service\)
November 20th, 2009 at 4:32 pm
Hi,
I have done just that and took my issues to my MP which can be found in the search engine just putting :
Landlords Accused of
Good Luck
November 20th, 2009 at 7:00 pm
Why bother sending a letter to the Managing Director?
When you follow it up, you will find that your letter has “not been received by us”.
This is because, in order for Solitaire to be in breach of contract (to repair things), most leases have a clause that requires someone to give them notice that a repair is required.
In this case, I’m afraid that your letter “will not have been received” by Solitaire, therefore they have not been given notice of a repair, therefore they are not in breach of contract.
I suggest you write to their solicitors, TSS Law, who will acknowledge receipt of your letter in writing to you by return, and pass it on to Solitaire. Since they, unlike Solitaire, are professionals, they will not pretend not to have received your letter, and you will then also have written evidence in the form of a reply from TSS Law stating that you have given notice and it has been received by Solitaire.
Of course, if everyone starts doing this, it means TSS Law will start to become the admin / postroom department of Solitaire, and they will probably feel Solitaire aren’t worth having as clients pretty soon!
This is called “getting a bad reputation”, and it seems to be happening very quickly to Solitaire now. (althogether now ahhhhhh poor solitaire…)
November 23rd, 2009 at 3:22 pm
Well I did actiall receive a reply from PeverelOM and just had a meeting this morning with the PM and his director. I went through all my complaints and they tried to skirt around alot, and took away plenty of actions to clarify costs to me.
They seemed very concerned with my accusations of breaking the Landlord and Tennant Act and the ARMA code of conduct. They seem convinced that they don’t need to show me invoices unless the accounts are audited. Athough I read the law as once receiving a summary (audited or not) I am entitled to see the invoices.
I also received a direct email from Mr. LM (CEO?) of Peverel as I CC’ed him onto the mail and he had knowledge of my meeting. I now have his mobile number (on his email signature) which was kind of him
I will follow up with results …
November 24th, 2009 at 12:52 pm
Hi Laurie
I worked for Pevrel Om in Wandsworth and reading your letter was like re-visiting a nightmare. The same problems over and over, contractors who were paid when they had not carried out work, a head office that did not respond, gardeners who did not do water, a fountain which seemed to ‘fail’ every five minutes and then cost residents fortunes, a restarant without front lighting for months and months, floods to buildings and lifts that were downright dangerous. As a manager I tried to address the issues and did the best I could however I was stopped from talking to the contractors by head office and then left because of extreme bullying. I do sympathise as they are the most [AMENDED AS COULD BE DEEMED AS LIBLE] organisation I have ever worked with.
November 24th, 2009 at 7:00 pm
Hi Sandra
Thank you for your courage to support our cause.
I know Peverel fairly well how they operate and what they are capable of from my personal experience. I do not wish to frighten you but to give pointers to keep your safe. My sincere advice is to you all the whistle blowers is too keep your identity hidden as much as can till it is forced out of you by the law or some news paper/ media is ready to take the story. Be very vigilant and record every thing what is going around you even in your personal life.
Do please join us with your inner knowledge of the company as you are a breath of fresh air so we are not labelled as serial complainers.
Bless you
November 26th, 2009 at 7:34 pm
So, it is now 3 weeks after this letter was sent.
How much of your money have Solitaire returned to you due to the numerous breaches of contract?
Words are very cheap for Solitaire (although you wouldn’t know it from their inability to answer a telephone). I would do the same they have done, arrange a meeting or whatever, and hope you go away.
I would like to give encouraging words, but writing letters is pointless, it costs you time and it doesn’t result in any of the money Solitaire have illegally taken from you being returned.
Solicitors, LVTs, and enfranchisements, on the other hand, might do the trick a little bit more effectively.
November 30th, 2009 at 11:49 am
So I received my audited accounts for June 2008 to May 2009 this morning … yes it took that long, I need to look through them properly but it looks like they are trying to say everything is in order … I THINK NOT!
December 2nd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
Laurie – I know from bitter experience they are not legally obliged to reveal any information regarding invoices less than 250 pounds – query the invoices larger than £250, but don’t waste time on those less than £250 – the law says they don’t have to break down those ones