<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Peverel OM Rebranding?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/12/16/is-peverel-om-rebranding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/12/16/is-peverel-om-rebranding/</link>
	<description>(including Consensus Business Group Companies)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:28:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicky Vogg</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/12/16/is-peverel-om-rebranding/comment-page-1/#comment-15408</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicky Vogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1013#comment-15408</guid>
		<description>Andy, I really feel for you when you are dealing / grieving for the loss of your mom and at the same time made to part with cash further to pay for service charge with threats or may lose the inheritance is horrific. Just coming to the site has highlighted your problem and many others in your position. The truth is the leaseholders, who can ill afford rip off service charge or can sell their property are suffering just like you nad me.

In my opinion TTAS contribution is double edge sword which helps many but also can harm at a small level. Knowingly, I will still contribute without shadow of doubt, otherwise people like me will have no voice. Even now PMC “position” remains the same and I am made to lose more and more. They pick answers from the air, cannot back their own contractor’s actions or reports then bully (as per dictionary meaning) to accept their inaccurate conclusion to blame the victim. It is wrong morally, ethically and unprofessional to make the very people suffer and lose who are paying their living and high life style.

I cannot live my  in fear for loss of my life or money, threats or bow to bullies, so Andy I  have no choice in the matter but to endure and challenge to bring changes.  3 years is a long time to lose when your and mine money tied in.

Here are some of my links to see what I have endured:

http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/09/18/the-times-newspaper-coverage/

http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/01/21/the-story-of-nicky-vogg-part-ii/

http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/12/11/the-story-of-nicky-vogg/

http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/08/06/peverel-solitaires-md-lee-middleburgh/

http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/17/response-to-andys-comment-from-yesterday/

I wish both of us luck to be free from the clutches of  PMC sooner than later by selling our property.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, I really feel for you when you are dealing / grieving for the loss of your mom and at the same time made to part with cash further to pay for service charge with threats or may lose the inheritance is horrific. Just coming to the site has highlighted your problem and many others in your position. The truth is the leaseholders, who can ill afford rip off service charge or can sell their property are suffering just like you nad me.</p>
<p>In my opinion TTAS contribution is double edge sword which helps many but also can harm at a small level. Knowingly, I will still contribute without shadow of doubt, otherwise people like me will have no voice. Even now PMC “position” remains the same and I am made to lose more and more. They pick answers from the air, cannot back their own contractor’s actions or reports then bully (as per dictionary meaning) to accept their inaccurate conclusion to blame the victim. It is wrong morally, ethically and unprofessional to make the very people suffer and lose who are paying their living and high life style.</p>
<p>I cannot live my  in fear for loss of my life or money, threats or bow to bullies, so Andy I  have no choice in the matter but to endure and challenge to bring changes.  3 years is a long time to lose when your and mine money tied in.</p>
<p>Here are some of my links to see what I have endured:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/09/18/the-times-newspaper-coverage/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/09/18/the-times-newspaper-coverage/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/01/21/the-story-of-nicky-vogg-part-ii/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/01/21/the-story-of-nicky-vogg-part-ii/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/12/11/the-story-of-nicky-vogg/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/12/11/the-story-of-nicky-vogg/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/08/06/peverel-solitaires-md-lee-middleburgh/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/08/06/peverel-solitaires-md-lee-middleburgh/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/17/response-to-andys-comment-from-yesterday/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/17/response-to-andys-comment-from-yesterday/</a></p>
<p>I wish both of us luck to be free from the clutches of  PMC sooner than later by selling our property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy smith</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/12/16/is-peverel-om-rebranding/comment-page-1/#comment-15334</link>
		<dc:creator>andy smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1013#comment-15334</guid>
		<description>Hi all whilst i am glad to see peverel running scared and being shown to be the con merchants they are .. but all this bad publicity doesnt help those of us trying to sell our property ..weve been on the market for 3 years now since mum died and its costing us a fortune to keep the place running in maintenance costs money we cant really afford and if we dont pay we stand to forfeit the place ...lose lose lose</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all whilst i am glad to see peverel running scared and being shown to be the con merchants they are .. but all this bad publicity doesnt help those of us trying to sell our property ..weve been on the market for 3 years now since mum died and its costing us a fortune to keep the place running in maintenance costs money we cant really afford and if we dont pay we stand to forfeit the place &#8230;lose lose lose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda A</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/12/16/is-peverel-om-rebranding/comment-page-1/#comment-9619</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1013#comment-9619</guid>
		<description>So pleased to find this site! We are residents in a block in Essex also under Peverel&#039;s managment. We&#039;re so fed up we&#039;re starting a Residents Association so that Peverel (hopefully) will answer our questions. We have been excessively charged for work done by our very own concierges, or not done at all; and we also have a recurring problem with one lift which keeps dropping between floors and residents are having to prise the doors open to get out.
We&#039;re having our next meeting next week so I shall print this off and share with the group. Great work guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So pleased to find this site! We are residents in a block in Essex also under Peverel&#8217;s managment. We&#8217;re so fed up we&#8217;re starting a Residents Association so that Peverel (hopefully) will answer our questions. We have been excessively charged for work done by our very own concierges, or not done at all; and we also have a recurring problem with one lift which keeps dropping between floors and residents are having to prise the doors open to get out.<br />
We&#8217;re having our next meeting next week so I shall print this off and share with the group. Great work guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/12/16/is-peverel-om-rebranding/comment-page-1/#comment-9613</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1013#comment-9613</guid>
		<description>hi
glad to see there is so much opposition.  the change of name is so cynical after the sunday times report into tender rigging in favour of cirrus (a peverel company).
i have uncovered what i consider to be damming evidence of fraud going to the very top of peverel om.  
i recommend you all serve REQUEST FOR INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS UNDER SECTION 22 OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985 as you will be im sure amazed what you have been charged for.  i have found invoices for works not done, other schemes, even a birthday present. 
andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
glad to see there is so much opposition.  the change of name is so cynical after the sunday times report into tender rigging in favour of cirrus (a peverel company).<br />
i have uncovered what i consider to be damming evidence of fraud going to the very top of peverel om.<br />
i recommend you all serve REQUEST FOR INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS UNDER SECTION 22 OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985 as you will be im sure amazed what you have been charged for.  i have found invoices for works not done, other schemes, even a birthday present.<br />
andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/12/16/is-peverel-om-rebranding/comment-page-1/#comment-9272</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1013#comment-9272</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone,

Back in mid-December I promised to update you on any significant changes and I can now confirm that from the 3rd February 2010 Peverel OM will have a new trading identity known as OM Property Management - and a new customer website.

Customers living in Peverel OM managed properties will receive a letter explaining the changes from early next week, but we are happy to put everyone in the picture now, including our Solitaire customers.

So, why the change?

Prior to the purchase by the Peverel Group in 1998, Peverel OM was known as OM Management Services; that’s why we have chosen the OM Property Management name. Previous customer research had also suggested that there was confusion amongst residents living in Peverel OM and Peverel Retirement managed leasehold properties. 

Creating a simple name change helps to clarify to customers who their managing agent is, and it prevents calls and emails being misdirected to the wrong Customer Services team. In fact, the decision to change the name was taken over a year ago, and we’ve been working hard to get everything ready for the official launch date of 3rd February.

The new OM customer website - www.ompropertymanagement.co.uk - is now live for everyone to view. It has useful information on the OM Property Management team and the services we provide to leasehold customers. In addition, the website also gives further information around house builders, housing associations, Right-to-Manage (RTM) and Resident Management Companies (RMC).

The ‘What You Need to Know’ section of the website explains how the OM Property Managers work and gives detailed explanations on topics such as Service Charge estimates and Reserve Funds. There’s also a helpful ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ section that seeks to address many common enquiries. 

I should point out that this change only affects customers living in Peverel OM managed properties; customers living in Solitaire developments should continue to contact the Solitaire Customer Services team as detailed on our website - www.solitairepm.co.uk.

As I said back in May last year, we are listening, and more importantly, we’re working to make things better. In the Solitaire Customer Services team we’ve made real progress in responding to customer enquiries via email (customerservices@solitairepm.co.uk), but please know that we are far from happy with our response times for telephone calls made to the team. 

We are working to implement telephony updates that will allow calls to be handled more effectively by identifying whether it relates to a maintenance issue or accounts enquiry. We hope that this work will be completed next month, but would like to apologise to anyone who has called with a problem and not been able to get through at certain times of the day. 

Since the Solitaire team moved to Luton our Solitaire Property Managers are visiting developments more frequently than in the past. We are making further operational changes to the team to ensure that they continue to focus on the issues affecting you, and are able to resolve any problems on your development with greater effectiveness and efficiency.

We receive customer feedback by email, letter, phone and of course via this site; I will continue to respond to constructive comments where I can.

Thanks, 

Andy

Solitaire Online Feedback Manager</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone,</p>
<p>Back in mid-December I promised to update you on any significant changes and I can now confirm that from the 3rd February 2010 Peverel OM will have a new trading identity known as OM Property Management &#8211; and a new customer website.</p>
<p>Customers living in Peverel OM managed properties will receive a letter explaining the changes from early next week, but we are happy to put everyone in the picture now, including our Solitaire customers.</p>
<p>So, why the change?</p>
<p>Prior to the purchase by the Peverel Group in 1998, Peverel OM was known as OM Management Services; that’s why we have chosen the OM Property Management name. Previous customer research had also suggested that there was confusion amongst residents living in Peverel OM and Peverel Retirement managed leasehold properties. </p>
<p>Creating a simple name change helps to clarify to customers who their managing agent is, and it prevents calls and emails being misdirected to the wrong Customer Services team. In fact, the decision to change the name was taken over a year ago, and we’ve been working hard to get everything ready for the official launch date of 3rd February.</p>
<p>The new OM customer website &#8211; <a href="http://www.ompropertymanagement.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.ompropertymanagement.co.uk</a> &#8211; is now live for everyone to view. It has useful information on the OM Property Management team and the services we provide to leasehold customers. In addition, the website also gives further information around house builders, housing associations, Right-to-Manage (RTM) and Resident Management Companies (RMC).</p>
<p>The ‘What You Need to Know’ section of the website explains how the OM Property Managers work and gives detailed explanations on topics such as Service Charge estimates and Reserve Funds. There’s also a helpful ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ section that seeks to address many common enquiries. </p>
<p>I should point out that this change only affects customers living in Peverel OM managed properties; customers living in Solitaire developments should continue to contact the Solitaire Customer Services team as detailed on our website &#8211; <a href="http://www.solitairepm.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.solitairepm.co.uk</a>.</p>
<p>As I said back in May last year, we are listening, and more importantly, we’re working to make things better. In the Solitaire Customer Services team we’ve made real progress in responding to customer enquiries via email (customerservices@solitairepm.co.uk), but please know that we are far from happy with our response times for telephone calls made to the team. </p>
<p>We are working to implement telephony updates that will allow calls to be handled more effectively by identifying whether it relates to a maintenance issue or accounts enquiry. We hope that this work will be completed next month, but would like to apologise to anyone who has called with a problem and not been able to get through at certain times of the day. </p>
<p>Since the Solitaire team moved to Luton our Solitaire Property Managers are visiting developments more frequently than in the past. We are making further operational changes to the team to ensure that they continue to focus on the issues affecting you, and are able to resolve any problems on your development with greater effectiveness and efficiency.</p>
<p>We receive customer feedback by email, letter, phone and of course via this site; I will continue to respond to constructive comments where I can.</p>
<p>Thanks, </p>
<p>Andy</p>
<p>Solitaire Online Feedback Manager</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicky Vogg</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/12/16/is-peverel-om-rebranding/comment-page-1/#comment-9263</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicky Vogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1013#comment-9263</guid>
		<description>NEWS FLASH – Peverel Om on rebranding

“Peverel OM Launches New Trading Identity and Customer Website on 3rd February 2010 
19/1/2010 - 
National property managers Peverel OM, who manage over 1,100 privately owned residential developments will be changing their trading name to OM Property Management and launching a new look corporate identity and customer website on 
Wednesday 3rd February 2010.
The new customer website has been designed to meet the needs of all customers living in Peverel OM managed leasehold properties throughout England and Wales. It provides useful information on the OM Property Management team and the services they provide to leaseholders, house builders, developers, housing associations/RSL’s, Right-to-Manage (RTM) and Resident Management Companies (RMC).

Customers will be able to use the ‘What You Need to Know’ section of the website to obtain useful information on how OM Property Managers work to provide customers with a quality, value for money property management service for every development. Detailed explanations on topics such as Service Charge estimates, Reserve Funds and Ground Rents are provided together with many Frequently Asked Questions. 
So, why the change?
Prior to the purchase by the Peverel Group in 1998, Peverel OM was known as OM Management Services. Recent customer research had also suggested that there was confusion amongst residents between Peverel OM and the Peverel Retirement Division so by creating a simple name change would help clarify this to customers.

OM Property Management is a trading name for Peverel OM Limited and the business remains a Peverel Group company.

Changing the company name will not affect the services that Peverel OM currently provides to customers.”

Andy please comment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEWS FLASH – Peverel Om on rebranding</p>
<p>“Peverel OM Launches New Trading Identity and Customer Website on 3rd February 2010<br />
19/1/2010 &#8211;<br />
National property managers Peverel OM, who manage over 1,100 privately owned residential developments will be changing their trading name to OM Property Management and launching a new look corporate identity and customer website on<br />
Wednesday 3rd February 2010.<br />
The new customer website has been designed to meet the needs of all customers living in Peverel OM managed leasehold properties throughout England and Wales. It provides useful information on the OM Property Management team and the services they provide to leaseholders, house builders, developers, housing associations/RSL’s, Right-to-Manage (RTM) and Resident Management Companies (RMC).</p>
<p>Customers will be able to use the ‘What You Need to Know’ section of the website to obtain useful information on how OM Property Managers work to provide customers with a quality, value for money property management service for every development. Detailed explanations on topics such as Service Charge estimates, Reserve Funds and Ground Rents are provided together with many Frequently Asked Questions.<br />
So, why the change?<br />
Prior to the purchase by the Peverel Group in 1998, Peverel OM was known as OM Management Services. Recent customer research had also suggested that there was confusion amongst residents between Peverel OM and the Peverel Retirement Division so by creating a simple name change would help clarify this to customers.</p>
<p>OM Property Management is a trading name for Peverel OM Limited and the business remains a Peverel Group company.</p>
<p>Changing the company name will not affect the services that Peverel OM currently provides to customers.”</p>
<p>Andy please comment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/12/16/is-peverel-om-rebranding/comment-page-1/#comment-9252</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1013#comment-9252</guid>
		<description>Reply to Bella:

The Right to Manage is just that - a right. There are only limited grounds to oppose your right, assuming you meet the criteria.

And it&#039;s not down to Peverel or the property management company to make life difficult as the claim notice is served on the freeholder NOT the PMC.  Although I accept that Peverel Companies and the freeholders are often linked.

The RTM process involves very tight deadlines once the notice is served on the freeholder.  My advice is to not waste your time listing detailed complaints here (it IS an excelent site), just whip up support for RTM among you neighbours.

Despite PPMG&#039;s size, we found it had a very small legal team, so the more claim notices served on them the better.

Our RTM took about nine months - there are loads of solicitors some with fact sheets on the RTM process.  Good luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reply to Bella:</p>
<p>The Right to Manage is just that &#8211; a right. There are only limited grounds to oppose your right, assuming you meet the criteria.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s not down to Peverel or the property management company to make life difficult as the claim notice is served on the freeholder NOT the PMC.  Although I accept that Peverel Companies and the freeholders are often linked.</p>
<p>The RTM process involves very tight deadlines once the notice is served on the freeholder.  My advice is to not waste your time listing detailed complaints here (it IS an excelent site), just whip up support for RTM among you neighbours.</p>
<p>Despite PPMG&#8217;s size, we found it had a very small legal team, so the more claim notices served on them the better.</p>
<p>Our RTM took about nine months &#8211; there are loads of solicitors some with fact sheets on the RTM process.  Good luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/12/16/is-peverel-om-rebranding/comment-page-1/#comment-9248</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1013#comment-9248</guid>
		<description>sally says owned for 11 year sorry mistyped</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sally says owned for 11 year sorry mistyped</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/12/16/is-peverel-om-rebranding/comment-page-1/#comment-9247</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1013#comment-9247</guid>
		<description>Just found this site! what an eye opener, Peverel OM or is it just OM? Just had a demand charging for subletting of £115.50 I paid Peverel same amount 6 months ago, then my Tenent  gave notice, so now I must pay again. OR Consent by a Global License for the princely sum of £346.63. presumably one off payment. However a registration fee of £25 to be paid for new tenants. I have owned and let this apartment for 1 years why now after all this time have they decided to charge? Licensed to print money of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just found this site! what an eye opener, Peverel OM or is it just OM? Just had a demand charging for subletting of £115.50 I paid Peverel same amount 6 months ago, then my Tenent  gave notice, so now I must pay again. OR Consent by a Global License for the princely sum of £346.63. presumably one off payment. However a registration fee of £25 to be paid for new tenants. I have owned and let this apartment for 1 years why now after all this time have they decided to charge? Licensed to print money of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2009/12/16/is-peverel-om-rebranding/comment-page-1/#comment-8927</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1013#comment-8927</guid>
		<description>So &quot;Peverel OM&quot; are to become simply &quot;OM&quot;.  In other words, they&#039;re going all anonymous (apologies to &quot;A N Onymous&quot; who regularly posts on here...!!!).

Is this re-branding a half-hearted attempt to try and get away from the on-going criticism associated with the &quot;Peverel&quot; name...???  If so, they&#039;ll be wasting more of their customer&#039;s money on a re-branding exercise that will fool nobody (apart perhaps from themselves).

Perhaps &quot;Andy&quot; can confirm that this re-branding is indeed happening?  And if it is, what exactly are Peverel hoping to gain from it...???  And how much is said re-branding actually costing...???

So, what&#039;s next?  &quot;Estates &amp; Management Limited&quot; to be re-branded as &quot;Limited&quot;...???  Or &quot;Consensus Business Group&quot; to become simply &quot;Group&quot;...???

Rather than spending God-knows how much money on re-branding, why don&#039;t they concentrate on doing their jobs correctly...???  Like actually managing &amp; maintaining the developments we live on (&quot;services&quot; we are paying for)...???  Sorry - that&#039;s probably just too radical an idea.....

A new name will not magically sort out the problems over-night...!!!  In fact, a new name means precisely nothing - new name, same old s**t.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So &#8220;Peverel OM&#8221; are to become simply &#8220;OM&#8221;.  In other words, they&#8217;re going all anonymous (apologies to &#8220;A N Onymous&#8221; who regularly posts on here&#8230;!!!).</p>
<p>Is this re-branding a half-hearted attempt to try and get away from the on-going criticism associated with the &#8220;Peverel&#8221; name&#8230;???  If so, they&#8217;ll be wasting more of their customer&#8217;s money on a re-branding exercise that will fool nobody (apart perhaps from themselves).</p>
<p>Perhaps &#8220;Andy&#8221; can confirm that this re-branding is indeed happening?  And if it is, what exactly are Peverel hoping to gain from it&#8230;???  And how much is said re-branding actually costing&#8230;???</p>
<p>So, what&#8217;s next?  &#8220;Estates &amp; Management Limited&#8221; to be re-branded as &#8220;Limited&#8221;&#8230;???  Or &#8220;Consensus Business Group&#8221; to become simply &#8220;Group&#8221;&#8230;???</p>
<p>Rather than spending God-knows how much money on re-branding, why don&#8217;t they concentrate on doing their jobs correctly&#8230;???  Like actually managing &amp; maintaining the developments we live on (&#8220;services&#8221; we are paying for)&#8230;???  Sorry &#8211; that&#8217;s probably just too radical an idea&#8230;..</p>
<p>A new name will not magically sort out the problems over-night&#8230;!!!  In fact, a new name means precisely nothing &#8211; new name, same old s**t&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
