Companies House shows the status of Fairhold Artemis (Company No. 05757088) as “Active – Proposal to Strike off”, and their Nature of Business as “7499 – Non-trading company”.

So, if Fairhold Artemis own the freehold to Chelsea Bridge Wharf, what happens as / when this company formally ceases to be, as appears to be the case…??? Where does the ownership of the freehold go then…??? I’d assume that the Resident’s Association at Chelsea Bridge Wharf are aware of this, but if not perhaps they need to get some answers PDQ….. Which won’t be forthcoming from anybody remotely linked to Peverel / CBG, as we know that they are wholly incapable of providing answers, never mind quickly…..

So, another name to add to the list of companies under the Peverel / CBG banner. With questions against them. No change there, then…..

Berkeleys have rebranded our parking lot, calling it PPL, a subsidiary they own and or control, and hired a draconian private company to clamp and ticket residents and owners cars while keeping the extremely excessively over the top ticking fees.
Our complex was built by Berkeley homes and Gross Fine did a very poor job as the property managers until one year ago when Peverels OG were appointed by Berkeleys. This was coincidentally around the same time that Fairhold Artimus purchased the Freeholds from Berkeley homes. We made over 100 requests for detailed financial disclosure dating back to 2005 pertaining to the service charges at CBW back to 2004, we only recently were given these by way of LVT order. We are in the process of an LVT action and would like to have discussions with all owners who have the same or similar issues.

Contact us; cbwtacommittee@gmail.com

STAT POTENTIA IN CONSENSU ATQUE UNITATE

Kindly advise if possible,

Thanks

Kingsborough Insurance Services – In 2007, turn over was £4,331,946 which increased to £5,439,241 for 2008 while profit grew after tax from £2,640,702 to £6,501,162.

Kingsborough Insurance Services Accounts
Tax year turn over for 2007: £4,331,946
A profit after tax: £2,640,702

Tax year turn over for 2008: £5,439,241
A profit grew to £6,501,162.

Profit is nearly 200%

Does it match with the turn over which is less then profit as popinted out by Matt.

Was there a gift from Father Christmas or what?

Peverel Om – turn over is also increased but the profits do not match as listed below.

Peverel OM Limited Accounts:
Tax year turn over for 2007: £11,871,102
A profit after tax: £1,648,565

Tax year turn over for 2008: £13,025,554
A profit after tax: £1,653,820

Estate & Management – they have made a lose of £889,008 in 2006 but in 2007 turnover is reduced from £5,056,460 to £4,221,496, however, the loss has converted into profit of £1,582,894

Estates & Management Accounts
Tax year turn over for 2006: £5,056,460
A loss of after tax: £889,008

Tax year turn over for 2007: £4,221,496
A profit after tax: £1,582,894

Is it possible that the auditors are turning blind eye or is there an explanation which I like to know?

In my experience cooperate world is supporting the giant against the little people.

My newly appointed Loss Assessor, turned against me making impossible to act on my behalf so I fired him. On 2 January 2010, I received court summons for breach of his contact. I have received no formal contact to sign or formal notices for his alleged debt of over £2000.

Is there a hope for people like Nicky Vogg who may die without justice because she is individualist with mind of her own, Asian women of 62 and 5 FT 3 and half inches tall? It appears her “persona” does not fit in the cooperate world. She believes there is only one world, one race and one country. Differences in the human beings are due to cultures, environment and climate.

She seeks Justice as her birth right.

Kingsborough Insurance Services, in 2008: turnover of £5.4m, profit of £6.5m. So they somehow seem to have made more money AFTER tax, assuming the figures quoted are correct…??? Which surely they can’t be…???

Cirrus Communication Systems Limited, in 2008: £13.2m turnover, but only £56k profit…??? How can that be? Staff Christmas bonuses must have been low in 2009…???!!! Or perhaps they were very high in 2008…???

And the grand overall picture – over the past couple of years, CBG are making a loss…..

Apart from the obvious discrepancies noted above, something simply does not add up…..

Ph: 020 7355 7777

info@cbg.uk.com