<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Residential Property Tribunal Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/01/29/residential-property-tribunal-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/01/29/residential-property-tribunal-service/</link>
	<description>(formerly Solitaire Property Management &#38; Peverel Group, including Consensus Business Group Companies)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:57:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/01/29/residential-property-tribunal-service/comment-page-2/#comment-34663</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1161#comment-34663</guid>
		<description>the above posts are about c**** **** company. their name
is c **** construction.

[Admin Edit]
Due to the above company having previously been named, we were advised by the named company that future reference to them would result in legal action bring taken against TTAS and therefore had to moderate this comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the above posts are about c**** **** company. their name<br />
is c **** construction.</p>
<p>[Admin Edit]<br />
Due to the above company having previously been named, we were advised by the named company that future reference to them would result in legal action bring taken against TTAS and therefore had to moderate this comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/01/29/residential-property-tribunal-service/comment-page-2/#comment-10833</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1161#comment-10833</guid>
		<description>&quot;Andy&quot;,

On Monday evening (22nd Feb) I sent you an email, attaching a copy of a letter (plus enclosures) as posted to my property manager (MP) the same day.  The letter was regarding buildings insurance for my development, and the enclosures were the current Zurich policy certificate, plus a quote I have obtained myself (being less than half the cost of the current Zurich - arranged by Oval - policy).  You have invited us to submit alternative quotes, after all.....

In my email to you, I specifically asked you to acknowledge receipt, and to also confirm that you have forwarded the email on to the appropriate people for consideration &amp; comment.

I have received a Read Receipt from you - confirming you read the email at 9.00am on Tuesday 23rd Feb, but no actual reply, to date.  So, I don&#039;t actually know whether you have even read my email (or just clicked the &quot;Yes&quot; button when asked if you wanted to send the receipt back), and I don&#039;t know if you have forwarded the email on, as I have requested.

So, perhaps you could advise accordingly...???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Andy&#8221;,</p>
<p>On Monday evening (22nd Feb) I sent you an email, attaching a copy of a letter (plus enclosures) as posted to my property manager (MP) the same day.  The letter was regarding buildings insurance for my development, and the enclosures were the current Zurich policy certificate, plus a quote I have obtained myself (being less than half the cost of the current Zurich &#8211; arranged by Oval &#8211; policy).  You have invited us to submit alternative quotes, after all&#8230;..</p>
<p>In my email to you, I specifically asked you to acknowledge receipt, and to also confirm that you have forwarded the email on to the appropriate people for consideration &amp; comment.</p>
<p>I have received a Read Receipt from you &#8211; confirming you read the email at 9.00am on Tuesday 23rd Feb, but no actual reply, to date.  So, I don&#8217;t actually know whether you have even read my email (or just clicked the &#8220;Yes&#8221; button when asked if you wanted to send the receipt back), and I don&#8217;t know if you have forwarded the email on, as I have requested.</p>
<p>So, perhaps you could advise accordingly&#8230;???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/01/29/residential-property-tribunal-service/comment-page-2/#comment-10828</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1161#comment-10828</guid>
		<description>Hi Bella,

I read your postings on both this and other threads, including your response to my post of the 2nd February on insurance, as I understand that you have been unhappy with the management of your development for some time.

We do want to understand the problems that are specific to your development and try to resolve them. That’s why we feel we would like to offer for one of our senior managers in our property management team to meet you personally to listen and discuss how we can resolve the problems on your development. 

My direct email address is andy.solitairepm@peverel.co.uk and I will arrange for someone to contact you direct to agree a mutually agreeable date and time.

I do hope you will get in contact as our only aim is to resolve your problems and hopefully begin to regain your trust in our company.
  
Thanks,

Andy
Solitaire Online Feedback Manager</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bella,</p>
<p>I read your postings on both this and other threads, including your response to my post of the 2nd February on insurance, as I understand that you have been unhappy with the management of your development for some time.</p>
<p>We do want to understand the problems that are specific to your development and try to resolve them. That’s why we feel we would like to offer for one of our senior managers in our property management team to meet you personally to listen and discuss how we can resolve the problems on your development. </p>
<p>My direct email address is <a href="mailto:andy.solitairepm@peverel.co.uk">andy.solitairepm@peverel.co.uk</a> and I will arrange for someone to contact you direct to agree a mutually agreeable date and time.</p>
<p>I do hope you will get in contact as our only aim is to resolve your problems and hopefully begin to regain your trust in our company.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Andy<br />
Solitaire Online Feedback Manager</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/01/29/residential-property-tribunal-service/comment-page-1/#comment-10808</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1161#comment-10808</guid>
		<description>hi nicky,
good luck in your forthcoming court case.  turning off your water supply for months seems excessive to prove a point; was this a recommendation of your expert?  hope the plumbing leak from above is now resolved.  
you are correct about expert witness reports that they must be in a special format and most importantly contain a declaration of truth.  i am not happy however with your use of the phrase &#039;conspire together against the Company&#039;.  this implies we are doing something wrong.  this is not the case; we are working together to share info and uncover the truth.  that is not a conspiracy.  the only party of wrongdoers are peverel and accordingly i for one have nothing to hide.
andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi nicky,<br />
good luck in your forthcoming court case.  turning off your water supply for months seems excessive to prove a point; was this a recommendation of your expert?  hope the plumbing leak from above is now resolved.<br />
you are correct about expert witness reports that they must be in a special format and most importantly contain a declaration of truth.  i am not happy however with your use of the phrase &#8216;conspire together against the Company&#8217;.  this implies we are doing something wrong.  this is not the case; we are working together to share info and uncover the truth.  that is not a conspiracy.  the only party of wrongdoers are peverel and accordingly i for one have nothing to hide.<br />
andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/01/29/residential-property-tribunal-service/comment-page-1/#comment-10665</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1161#comment-10665</guid>
		<description>It should be called Nicky Vogg&#039;s website</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be called Nicky Vogg&#8217;s website</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bella</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/01/29/residential-property-tribunal-service/comment-page-1/#comment-10654</link>
		<dc:creator>Bella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1161#comment-10654</guid>
		<description>Get a life!!!
And get your problems sorted!!
Stop bleating on here

Yawn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get a life!!!<br />
And get your problems sorted!!<br />
Stop bleating on here</p>
<p>Yawn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicky Vogg</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/01/29/residential-property-tribunal-service/comment-page-1/#comment-10653</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicky Vogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1161#comment-10653</guid>
		<description>I had no intention to upset you which I hope you can forgive.

My real horror story is not out yet. I would like to see if someone has suffered more then I have. I am very explosive by nature but was taught to remain focused and not get emotional if fighting the big boys.

What I have suffered  is not out yet  just like I have been  trying to muddle through to find solutions as the market is  not set up for the leaseholders needs. Bella I lived in a flat without hot or cold water supplies because I cut them off to prove that my water supplies could not flood the communal lift Shaft. I was actually sponging water by galleons each day by my hands. I lost 3 stone in weight due to contamination. I had no toilet facilities. Only when the water was tested we found out it was my neighbours poo and urine that was flowing in the flat.  Can you imagine living without any water months after months and no one is listening, at the same losing money every month.
I hope one day you might hear the whole story.  My whole intention was not just for you but for everyone. I hope you can just dismiss if it is not serving you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no intention to upset you which I hope you can forgive.</p>
<p>My real horror story is not out yet. I would like to see if someone has suffered more then I have. I am very explosive by nature but was taught to remain focused and not get emotional if fighting the big boys.</p>
<p>What I have suffered  is not out yet  just like I have been  trying to muddle through to find solutions as the market is  not set up for the leaseholders needs. Bella I lived in a flat without hot or cold water supplies because I cut them off to prove that my water supplies could not flood the communal lift Shaft. I was actually sponging water by galleons each day by my hands. I lost 3 stone in weight due to contamination. I had no toilet facilities. Only when the water was tested we found out it was my neighbours poo and urine that was flowing in the flat.  Can you imagine living without any water months after months and no one is listening, at the same losing money every month.<br />
I hope one day you might hear the whole story.  My whole intention was not just for you but for everyone. I hope you can just dismiss if it is not serving you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bella</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/01/29/residential-property-tribunal-service/comment-page-1/#comment-10650</link>
		<dc:creator>Bella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1161#comment-10650</guid>
		<description>Quote Nicky Vogg: &quot;I presumed Bella wanted also a surveyor to establish building valve against Peverel Insurance Policy scam.&quot;

No I didn&#039;t.  You, yet, again have misinterpreted!!
N.B.
Before you post, please ensure you are in command of the full facts before adding your valueless comments.
They ruin the work of TTAS, us people working hard to rid ourselves of OM Property Management et al and trying to colaborate together to resolve our issues.
I will not posting on this site again, thanks to you!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote Nicky Vogg: &#8220;I presumed Bella wanted also a surveyor to establish building valve against Peverel Insurance Policy scam.&#8221;</p>
<p>No I didn&#8217;t.  You, yet, again have misinterpreted!!<br />
N.B.<br />
Before you post, please ensure you are in command of the full facts before adding your valueless comments.<br />
They ruin the work of TTAS, us people working hard to rid ourselves of OM Property Management et al and trying to colaborate together to resolve our issues.<br />
I will not posting on this site again, thanks to you!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicky Vogg</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/01/29/residential-property-tribunal-service/comment-page-1/#comment-10639</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicky Vogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1161#comment-10639</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrew, You are right to correct me as I presumed Bella wanted also a surveyor to establish building valve against Peverel Insurance Policy scam. Thank you.

I like to add that we are at the melting process of RTM or LVT and so foth and testing the water and giving our opinions so others can join in to find the perfect solution. At no time I thought your point of view was other then honourable or you had an ulterior motive.

In my case I was advised to get Expert Witness Surveyor who specialise in refurbishment of the building. Theses experts are mainly to appear in the court to give evidence. They are impartial, only state the facts and have to write their report in a certain manner which is accepted by the court and other professionals. I have worked with 2 of them who have given me their reports which will be used in court against OM. 

I am wondering if one rings some surveyors to talk through on the phone that is free or contact the Association for advice who would be best to advice what is required if going to fight a csea till admin has their own system to guide the way.

 Surveyor Association RICS web link is: http://www.rics.org/

My concern is that our is open format. If a surveyor is recommended then the management company may use it against the claimant as we are all trying to under valve their work and conspire together against the Company. In my opinion it is a double edge sword where the publicity can help you or harm you. If someone is going to fight them in the court or go for Tribunal mediation then it is utmost important to be careful what is disclosed here and how we are collecting evidence. I am myself is guilty of saying too much and often have said that I am not professional and only have life experiences so seek advice. I will be stating each time iin future, so thanks for pointing out to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew, You are right to correct me as I presumed Bella wanted also a surveyor to establish building valve against Peverel Insurance Policy scam. Thank you.</p>
<p>I like to add that we are at the melting process of RTM or LVT and so foth and testing the water and giving our opinions so others can join in to find the perfect solution. At no time I thought your point of view was other then honourable or you had an ulterior motive.</p>
<p>In my case I was advised to get Expert Witness Surveyor who specialise in refurbishment of the building. Theses experts are mainly to appear in the court to give evidence. They are impartial, only state the facts and have to write their report in a certain manner which is accepted by the court and other professionals. I have worked with 2 of them who have given me their reports which will be used in court against OM. </p>
<p>I am wondering if one rings some surveyors to talk through on the phone that is free or contact the Association for advice who would be best to advice what is required if going to fight a csea till admin has their own system to guide the way.</p>
<p> Surveyor Association RICS web link is: <a href="http://www.rics.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.rics.org/</a></p>
<p>My concern is that our is open format. If a surveyor is recommended then the management company may use it against the claimant as we are all trying to under valve their work and conspire together against the Company. In my opinion it is a double edge sword where the publicity can help you or harm you. If someone is going to fight them in the court or go for Tribunal mediation then it is utmost important to be careful what is disclosed here and how we are collecting evidence. I am myself is guilty of saying too much and often have said that I am not professional and only have life experiences so seek advice. I will be stating each time iin future, so thanks for pointing out to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/01/29/residential-property-tribunal-service/comment-page-1/#comment-10505</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1161#comment-10505</guid>
		<description>hi nicky
i wonder if you misunderstand what i said...im certainly not putting my services forward!  im saying a mortgage valuer does not have the correct skillset to decide if works are appropriate, preoperly tendered, reasonable cost etc.  a chartered building surveyor is a different type of chartered surveyor to a valuer.  hope thats clear.  i wonder if you are confusing valuations of buildings for mortgage purposes with valuing building works...these processes are completely different.
it is dangerous territory to give advice on something on which the poster may not be fully conversant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi nicky<br />
i wonder if you misunderstand what i said&#8230;im certainly not putting my services forward!  im saying a mortgage valuer does not have the correct skillset to decide if works are appropriate, preoperly tendered, reasonable cost etc.  a chartered building surveyor is a different type of chartered surveyor to a valuer.  hope thats clear.  i wonder if you are confusing valuations of buildings for mortgage purposes with valuing building works&#8230;these processes are completely different.<br />
it is dangerous territory to give advice on something on which the poster may not be fully conversant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

