<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it time for CALAFEX?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/01/is-it-time-for-calafex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/01/is-it-time-for-calafex/</link>
	<description>(formerly Solitaire Property Management &#38; Peverel Group, including Consensus Business Group Companies)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:49:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archangel</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/01/is-it-time-for-calafex/comment-page-1/#comment-9625</link>
		<dc:creator>Archangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1167#comment-9625</guid>
		<description>Hello Nicky Vogg (the famous, fighting Nicky Vogg!!)

I agree with the points you make regarding the changes that need to be made around leasehold/freehold and management of developments of apartments and flats (subject only to the fact that all parties ahve a right to some protection and to defend themselves in law).

Battle stations - let battle commence!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Nicky Vogg (the famous, fighting Nicky Vogg!!)</p>
<p>I agree with the points you make regarding the changes that need to be made around leasehold/freehold and management of developments of apartments and flats (subject only to the fact that all parties ahve a right to some protection and to defend themselves in law).</p>
<p>Battle stations &#8211; let battle commence!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicky Vogg</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/01/is-it-time-for-calafex/comment-page-1/#comment-9592</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicky Vogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1167#comment-9592</guid>
		<description>I agree we need a nationwide campaign and to simplify my proposal is:

1.THE BUILDERS:
•The price of the land to be included in the sale price of the property.
•To create lease where the power of Lessor (LAND LORDS) in the lease is given to a Limited Company. The Land to be given back to the owners in the form of SHARES ISSUED by the limited company
•THE OWNERS ASSOICATION’S DIRECTORS OF THE BOARD TO RUN THE LIMITED COMPANY.
• This ASSOICATION has the right to hire or fire any management company.
 
2.THE LANDLORDS: The current landlords to agree to allow the smooth RTM if anyone wishes to go.

3.CURRENT MANAGEMNT COMPANIES: to be regulated and to be investigated.

We should send the message to the builders if there are no limited companies created in the lease and the land is not given to the leaseholders then we are campaigning to stop the buyers to buy your properties because we want the exploitation stops here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree we need a nationwide campaign and to simplify my proposal is:</p>
<p>1.THE BUILDERS:<br />
•The price of the land to be included in the sale price of the property.<br />
•To create lease where the power of Lessor (LAND LORDS) in the lease is given to a Limited Company. The Land to be given back to the owners in the form of SHARES ISSUED by the limited company<br />
•THE OWNERS ASSOICATION’S DIRECTORS OF THE BOARD TO RUN THE LIMITED COMPANY.<br />
• This ASSOICATION has the right to hire or fire any management company.</p>
<p>2.THE LANDLORDS: The current landlords to agree to allow the smooth RTM if anyone wishes to go.</p>
<p>3.CURRENT MANAGEMNT COMPANIES: to be regulated and to be investigated.</p>
<p>We should send the message to the builders if there are no limited companies created in the lease and the land is not given to the leaseholders then we are campaigning to stop the buyers to buy your properties because we want the exploitation stops here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/01/is-it-time-for-calafex/comment-page-1/#comment-9583</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1167#comment-9583</guid>
		<description>I have always felt we have power in the sheer number of leaseholders who feel unhappy/frustrated/helpless.  We need to channel this power and take on these people who are answerable only to themselves, and see us as cash cows.  This website is helping all of us (some young, some not so young) to be aware that we are great in number.  While even my own MP himself says these companies are a licence to print money he seems unable to make change happen.  

It is high time we had an organised group to spearhead a big campaign and force the powers that be to make changes and give us back control over the companies that should be providing a service at a competive price to all instead of holding us to ransom.

Landlords many of whom just take over large number of  properties on developments, must be made aware how beneficial change will be.  It is high time they stopped looking at the short term gains (of rental income) and looked at the long term.  These landlords by their apathy make us weaker.  They need to come on board too.  

I feel sure we could fill a football stadium.  Let&#039;s do that and bring in the media, lets tell our stories showing the evidence we have.  Let us name and shame!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always felt we have power in the sheer number of leaseholders who feel unhappy/frustrated/helpless.  We need to channel this power and take on these people who are answerable only to themselves, and see us as cash cows.  This website is helping all of us (some young, some not so young) to be aware that we are great in number.  While even my own MP himself says these companies are a licence to print money he seems unable to make change happen.  </p>
<p>It is high time we had an organised group to spearhead a big campaign and force the powers that be to make changes and give us back control over the companies that should be providing a service at a competive price to all instead of holding us to ransom.</p>
<p>Landlords many of whom just take over large number of  properties on developments, must be made aware how beneficial change will be.  It is high time they stopped looking at the short term gains (of rental income) and looked at the long term.  These landlords by their apathy make us weaker.  They need to come on board too.  </p>
<p>I feel sure we could fill a football stadium.  Let&#8217;s do that and bring in the media, lets tell our stories showing the evidence we have.  Let us name and shame!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicky Vogg</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/01/is-it-time-for-calafex/comment-page-1/#comment-9561</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicky Vogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1167#comment-9561</guid>
		<description>Go Admin GO

I am in agreement with ArchAngel as the problem is nationwide with management companies and not only CBG group. 

As the name is similar I am wondering how Carlex would take it? Have you asked them for their input? 

Some of us would have relative/s, parents or grand parents living in a managed care or shelter homes  so it would be the right branch to launch further campaign whether someone owns a  managed property or not.

Basically on our site is youth apart from a few like me as “serial complainers”( “Dribbling Geriatrics”)  on the other side some of them have time and looking for stimulation and wondering if both of you can join forces while keeping both sites as they are with additional pages attached for  the nationwide coverage .

MY focus campaign would be on the following points:

1. To lobby all the builders nationwide forcing them to register a Limited Company for Owners Association.  The membership  to the Association to be included in the sale price.

If their are many blocks in the development then having a Master Owner Association to take care of the communal area who can appoint Management Company . The board would be 1 director/member from each block Association. The right of the lessor (landlord) in the  lease to be transferred to the master Association for the communal area. It would keep the present format lease intact as it is.

The land for the block has to be transferred free of charge to the Association of the block ( not to be sold to the landlord) after the  block is finished.  They must include the land price in their sale price of the property in the first place.

2.One stop  assistance to fight the right to Manage.

3. To stop the exploitation of the leaseholders ( any age) to get better deal.

4. To get the nationwide press behind with a campaign  to tell the new buyers  that they should only buy property if the builder is willing to include registered  Limited Company with Owner Association  or they are refusing to  buy. They do not wish to enter into fight the right to mange  or buying the land back after the block/deployment is finished.

5. If Admin could have a leaflet ready to download for the builder to drop at their sale team for the new deployments. This will send the message that they have no choice but give in.

My message: Owners rule while landlords be ready to be removed  

You all know who I am. You get what you see in me or should I see you read. Currently I am writing on the site to help others. I have no professional expertise in business. If you think I can help then contact me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Admin GO</p>
<p>I am in agreement with ArchAngel as the problem is nationwide with management companies and not only CBG group. </p>
<p>As the name is similar I am wondering how Carlex would take it? Have you asked them for their input? </p>
<p>Some of us would have relative/s, parents or grand parents living in a managed care or shelter homes  so it would be the right branch to launch further campaign whether someone owns a  managed property or not.</p>
<p>Basically on our site is youth apart from a few like me as “serial complainers”( “Dribbling Geriatrics”)  on the other side some of them have time and looking for stimulation and wondering if both of you can join forces while keeping both sites as they are with additional pages attached for  the nationwide coverage .</p>
<p>MY focus campaign would be on the following points:</p>
<p>1. To lobby all the builders nationwide forcing them to register a Limited Company for Owners Association.  The membership  to the Association to be included in the sale price.</p>
<p>If their are many blocks in the development then having a Master Owner Association to take care of the communal area who can appoint Management Company . The board would be 1 director/member from each block Association. The right of the lessor (landlord) in the  lease to be transferred to the master Association for the communal area. It would keep the present format lease intact as it is.</p>
<p>The land for the block has to be transferred free of charge to the Association of the block ( not to be sold to the landlord) after the  block is finished.  They must include the land price in their sale price of the property in the first place.</p>
<p>2.One stop  assistance to fight the right to Manage.</p>
<p>3. To stop the exploitation of the leaseholders ( any age) to get better deal.</p>
<p>4. To get the nationwide press behind with a campaign  to tell the new buyers  that they should only buy property if the builder is willing to include registered  Limited Company with Owner Association  or they are refusing to  buy. They do not wish to enter into fight the right to mange  or buying the land back after the block/deployment is finished.</p>
<p>5. If Admin could have a leaflet ready to download for the builder to drop at their sale team for the new deployments. This will send the message that they have no choice but give in.</p>
<p>My message: Owners rule while landlords be ready to be removed  </p>
<p>You all know who I am. You get what you see in me or should I see you read. Currently I am writing on the site to help others. I have no professional expertise in business. If you think I can help then contact me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

