<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Major Victory in Largest LVT Case Brought in Britain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/13/major-victory-in-largest-lvt-case-brought-in-birmingham/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/13/major-victory-in-largest-lvt-case-brought-in-birmingham/</link>
	<description>(formerly Solitaire Property Management &#38; Peverel Group, including Consensus Business Group Companies)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:29:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irene</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/13/major-victory-in-largest-lvt-case-brought-in-birmingham/comment-page-1/#comment-17821</link>
		<dc:creator>Irene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 13:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1222#comment-17821</guid>
		<description>We have our insurance certificate, issued by Zurich with Oval as the broker, which appears to be a block policy, and says &quot;Any freehold owning company within the Peverel Group of Companies and any freeholders, management companies, commonhold associations and head lease owning companies with an insuranble interest in the insured property and any owners of property in Scotland for whom the Peverel Group of Companies has instructions to arrange insurance and the lessees where they are required to be joint insured under the terms of the lease.
Peverel does not own the freehold, but they are managing agents, and they arrange our insurance.   Do you think we could still be members of the 500?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have our insurance certificate, issued by Zurich with Oval as the broker, which appears to be a block policy, and says &#8220;Any freehold owning company within the Peverel Group of Companies and any freeholders, management companies, commonhold associations and head lease owning companies with an insuranble interest in the insured property and any owners of property in Scotland for whom the Peverel Group of Companies has instructions to arrange insurance and the lessees where they are required to be joint insured under the terms of the lease.<br />
Peverel does not own the freehold, but they are managing agents, and they arrange our insurance.   Do you think we could still be members of the 500?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Hunt</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/13/major-victory-in-largest-lvt-case-brought-in-birmingham/comment-page-1/#comment-12057</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1222#comment-12057</guid>
		<description>I have followed the &#039;truth about Solitiare&#039; website for some while and have to congratulate all those at City Heights. I own a flat in a block previously managed by Solitaire. The management was appalling.  Fortunatley I am a Director of a Company, Hunter Grey whose business is block management. We formed a Right To Manage Company and took over the management from Solitaire last year.  We now manage the block ourselves and have turned it around.    My message to anyone who has a flat managed by Solitaire is form an RTM Company, make getting rid of poor management a first priority.  Susan Hunt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have followed the &#8216;truth about Solitiare&#8217; website for some while and have to congratulate all those at City Heights. I own a flat in a block previously managed by Solitaire. The management was appalling.  Fortunatley I am a Director of a Company, Hunter Grey whose business is block management. We formed a Right To Manage Company and took over the management from Solitaire last year.  We now manage the block ourselves and have turned it around.    My message to anyone who has a flat managed by Solitaire is form an RTM Company, make getting rid of poor management a first priority.  Susan Hunt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: City Heights Resident</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/13/major-victory-in-largest-lvt-case-brought-in-birmingham/comment-page-1/#comment-10133</link>
		<dc:creator>City Heights Resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1222#comment-10133</guid>
		<description>Andy
Solitaire Online Feedback Manager

I live at City Heights and i am seriously offended by your comments AND MISLEADING STATEMENT!

Solitaire, e&amp;m or Peverel, whatever name you want to go by, have ruined our lives for the past six years! You have robbed us, ignored us and lied to us. THE SOONER YOU ARE GONE THE BETTER!

Even now the LVT is over you continue the Insurance scam by keeping City Heights Building Insurance policies with Zurich, through Oval at ULTRA high premiums, taking your kickbacks. NO LANDLORD should be making a profit in this way! The list of activities your Insurance arm claim they do to justify the commission is nothing short of armed robbery and you know it!

Everyone knows a women carrying a baby fell on the Franklin Bridge because she sued the estate for compensation as you very well know.

You also know residents in Nightingale House were reporting dirrhoea and sickness during the two year period the water tank was not chlorinated!

You also know a disabled women was trapped in the lift as during the LVT a Solitaire employee admitted this.

You also know the only reason why Solitaire are going as the property managers at City Heights is because the Residents Association started action to discharge and it was halted when you gave in and agreed to walk away. You only agreed because the evidence was so stacked up against you, you knew an LVT to appoint a new manager would have to prove failings and this could be easily achieved and would seriously damage your PR!

I also know from emails the Secretary of the City Heights Residents Association sends round that Morris Flynn, the BBC Reported said, and i quote, &#039;We have been told by Peverel we do not have consent or authority to film on any land belonging to the Freeholder&#039;. Anyone can call the BCC and ask for Morris Flynn and check exactly was Peverel told him. I have called Morris and he said he is happy for anyone to call him, as he said this is what he was told.

I also know that the Peverel Property Manager for City Heights accidently sent an email to a resident on City Heights just weeks before the LVT inwhich they slagged him off. The email was suppose to be seen by internal staff only but she sent it to the resident in error. Deny that Andy! Deny Peverel sent the resident a box of chocolates, a bottle of wine and an apology card! I have seen the card!

You people are just terrible and you play this PR game trying to make out the whole world is wrong and you are right!

I tell everyone who reads this..... start an LVT against Peverel if only to get back the Insurance Kick back payments!

City Heights Resident (Nottingham)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy<br />
Solitaire Online Feedback Manager</p>
<p>I live at City Heights and i am seriously offended by your comments AND MISLEADING STATEMENT!</p>
<p>Solitaire, e&amp;m or Peverel, whatever name you want to go by, have ruined our lives for the past six years! You have robbed us, ignored us and lied to us. THE SOONER YOU ARE GONE THE BETTER!</p>
<p>Even now the LVT is over you continue the Insurance scam by keeping City Heights Building Insurance policies with Zurich, through Oval at ULTRA high premiums, taking your kickbacks. NO LANDLORD should be making a profit in this way! The list of activities your Insurance arm claim they do to justify the commission is nothing short of armed robbery and you know it!</p>
<p>Everyone knows a women carrying a baby fell on the Franklin Bridge because she sued the estate for compensation as you very well know.</p>
<p>You also know residents in Nightingale House were reporting dirrhoea and sickness during the two year period the water tank was not chlorinated!</p>
<p>You also know a disabled women was trapped in the lift as during the LVT a Solitaire employee admitted this.</p>
<p>You also know the only reason why Solitaire are going as the property managers at City Heights is because the Residents Association started action to discharge and it was halted when you gave in and agreed to walk away. You only agreed because the evidence was so stacked up against you, you knew an LVT to appoint a new manager would have to prove failings and this could be easily achieved and would seriously damage your PR!</p>
<p>I also know from emails the Secretary of the City Heights Residents Association sends round that Morris Flynn, the BBC Reported said, and i quote, &#8216;We have been told by Peverel we do not have consent or authority to film on any land belonging to the Freeholder&#8217;. Anyone can call the BCC and ask for Morris Flynn and check exactly was Peverel told him. I have called Morris and he said he is happy for anyone to call him, as he said this is what he was told.</p>
<p>I also know that the Peverel Property Manager for City Heights accidently sent an email to a resident on City Heights just weeks before the LVT inwhich they slagged him off. The email was suppose to be seen by internal staff only but she sent it to the resident in error. Deny that Andy! Deny Peverel sent the resident a box of chocolates, a bottle of wine and an apology card! I have seen the card!</p>
<p>You people are just terrible and you play this PR game trying to make out the whole world is wrong and you are right!</p>
<p>I tell everyone who reads this&#8230;.. start an LVT against Peverel if only to get back the Insurance Kick back payments!</p>
<p>City Heights Resident (Nottingham)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bella</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/13/major-victory-in-largest-lvt-case-brought-in-birmingham/comment-page-1/#comment-10128</link>
		<dc:creator>Bella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1222#comment-10128</guid>
		<description>Hi yael and c

This is your first port of call.  Give them a call and you will find them very helpful

http://www.lease-advice.org.uk/

This is the heavier and legal stuff that&#039;s been made easier to understand by the above

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2002/en/ukpgaen_20020015_en_1

You will always find someone to help here of email the site administrators.

Good luck and get rid of Peverel :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi yael and c</p>
<p>This is your first port of call.  Give them a call and you will find them very helpful</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lease-advice.org.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lease-advice.org.uk/</a></p>
<p>This is the heavier and legal stuff that&#8217;s been made easier to understand by the above</p>
<p><a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2002/en/ukpgaen_20020015_en_1" rel="nofollow">http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2002/en/ukpgaen_20020015_en_1</a></p>
<p>You will always find someone to help here of email the site administrators.</p>
<p>Good luck and get rid of Peverel <img src='http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yael and c</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/13/major-victory-in-largest-lvt-case-brought-in-birmingham/comment-page-1/#comment-10051</link>
		<dc:creator>yael and c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1222#comment-10051</guid>
		<description>anyone able to advise re rivergate flats peterborough, yearly fee was £2000 last year for peverel doing nothing!! as far as i can see!!an increase from £450 a few years ago prior to them owning the freehold which they sneaked in and bought without telling any of us residents. they do very little in regard to our maintenence fees and its impossible to get hold of them, they even put up scaffolding on one of the block of flats pretending they were painting the windows etc but no painting was done!!i feel we are being ripped off just like others in this column</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anyone able to advise re rivergate flats peterborough, yearly fee was £2000 last year for peverel doing nothing!! as far as i can see!!an increase from £450 a few years ago prior to them owning the freehold which they sneaked in and bought without telling any of us residents. they do very little in regard to our maintenence fees and its impossible to get hold of them, they even put up scaffolding on one of the block of flats pretending they were painting the windows etc but no painting was done!!i feel we are being ripped off just like others in this column</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/13/major-victory-in-largest-lvt-case-brought-in-birmingham/comment-page-1/#comment-10049</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1222#comment-10049</guid>
		<description>Ok my certificates state &#039;oval insurance broking limited&#039; and the policy is with zurich.
any recommendations on what to do next on this?
our policy is around £2500 per year, so over 5 years of the development that totals around £12500, giving peverel a tidy sum of £4125
rip off merchants are my thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok my certificates state &#8216;oval insurance broking limited&#8217; and the policy is with zurich.<br />
any recommendations on what to do next on this?<br />
our policy is around £2500 per year, so over 5 years of the development that totals around £12500, giving peverel a tidy sum of £4125<br />
rip off merchants are my thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Dent</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/13/major-victory-in-largest-lvt-case-brought-in-birmingham/comment-page-1/#comment-10030</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Dent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1222#comment-10030</guid>
		<description>A sure fire way of knowing if you are in the &quot;fortune 500&quot; is to get a copy of your insurance certificate. Your Landlord have to supply this to you. On that certificate it will state Oval as the broker and Zurich as the insurer. Also there will be no mention of your site name and it will refer to any freehold or head leasehold interest of the Peverel group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sure fire way of knowing if you are in the &#8220;fortune 500&#8243; is to get a copy of your insurance certificate. Your Landlord have to supply this to you. On that certificate it will state Oval as the broker and Zurich as the insurer. Also there will be no mention of your site name and it will refer to any freehold or head leasehold interest of the Peverel group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/13/major-victory-in-largest-lvt-case-brought-in-birmingham/comment-page-1/#comment-10019</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1222#comment-10019</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Suzanne - can anybody provide a list specifically listing the 500 developments that are insured by Zurich, as arranged by Oval...???  I suspect my development will be on the list (it certainly fits the profile...), but it would be interesting to see.

The total of 500 developments was mentioned in the adjudication of the City Heights LVT tribunal hearing, so presumably there is some sort of evidence to back up this number...???

How do we get definite confirmation that our own development is included (or not, as the case may be...) in the mystical 500...???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Suzanne &#8211; can anybody provide a list specifically listing the 500 developments that are insured by Zurich, as arranged by Oval&#8230;???  I suspect my development will be on the list (it certainly fits the profile&#8230;), but it would be interesting to see.</p>
<p>The total of 500 developments was mentioned in the adjudication of the City Heights LVT tribunal hearing, so presumably there is some sort of evidence to back up this number&#8230;???</p>
<p>How do we get definite confirmation that our own development is included (or not, as the case may be&#8230;) in the mystical 500&#8230;???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gs</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/13/major-victory-in-largest-lvt-case-brought-in-birmingham/comment-page-1/#comment-10003</link>
		<dc:creator>gs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1222#comment-10003</guid>
		<description>Can an admin send me a copy of all the docs as I believe our development will also be affected by this LVT and insurance issue.

Many thanks for your help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can an admin send me a copy of all the docs as I believe our development will also be affected by this LVT and insurance issue.</p>
<p>Many thanks for your help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/02/13/major-victory-in-largest-lvt-case-brought-in-birmingham/comment-page-1/#comment-9985</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/?p=1222#comment-9985</guid>
		<description>Hi,
How do I get a copy of the list detailing the 500 developments covered by the &#039;agreement&#039; to basdically fix residents with Zurich for buildings insurance at super high premiums, I have always been sceptical about the charges detailed on the annual buildings insurance certificate provided in the name of Zurich and would be interested to know if we have fallen fowl to this surely illegal activity of solitaire
Sue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
How do I get a copy of the list detailing the 500 developments covered by the &#8216;agreement&#8217; to basdically fix residents with Zurich for buildings insurance at super high premiums, I have always been sceptical about the charges detailed on the annual buildings insurance certificate provided in the name of Zurich and would be interested to know if we have fallen fowl to this surely illegal activity of solitaire<br />
Sue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

