Posts Tagged ‘Solitaire Property Management’

Grim Update From Fortune One (City Heights)

It’s the morning after England were dumped embarrassingly out of the World Cup by the Germans – things can’t get any worse surely?  Well for the residents of ‘Fortune One’ or ‘City Heights, Nottingham’ it appears that it can! Over the weekend we were contacted by City Heights to bring us up to speed with [...]

Comments (47)

A Worried Home Owner

From time to time, we try to highlight some of the cases that get reported to us by residents of properties that Solitaire Property Management are responsible. This time, we’ve received the following message from a homeowner of a George Wimpey Development in Maidstone:- Hi Thanks for your website, we have been a new property [...]

Comments (14)

Another Body To Register Your Complaint With

Many of us will have registered complaints with ARMA, BBC Watchdog and even directly to Solitaire / Peverel, but we’ve been in contact with another body, that maybe able to help us. Consumer Focus is an independent champion for consumers across England, Wales, Scotland and (for postal consumers) in Northern Ireland.  They operate across the whole of [...]

Comments (13)

Peverel Group Still Yet To Pay A Penny

On the 13 February 2010, TheTruthAboutSolitaire reported on City Height’s LVT Victory against Peverel Group, which awarded the families a draft amount of £187, 573.53 to be paid back to them by Peverel Group. Three months on and we’ve received an update from City Height’s, which is listed below:- Update from Fortune One (City Heights) [...]

Comments (31)

Fire Safety and Health & Safety for your Development

In November 2009, following an investigation by Hampshire Fire & Rescue, we publicised the successful prosecution of Solitaire Property Management for failing to comply with fire safety law. For those that haven’t read about this, we have copied the information from Hampshire Fire & Rescue’s webite: 3 November 2009 Solitaire Property Management Limited has today been [...]

Comments (36)

Peverel Say Things Are Improving, We Don’t Think So!

Peverel’s online feedback manager – ‘Andy’ – continues to tell us that things are improving and that he’s there to help, but we’d love to know where he gets his facts from, in regards to these improvements! Why do we say this?  Well, we receive hundreds of e-mails each week from homeowners, who’s properties are managed [...]

Comments (28)

Worse Than Taking Candy From a Baby?

On Friday we received an e-mail from a TTAS visitor who lives in a property managed by Solitaire Property Management, in addition to their mother who also owned a Peverel Retirement property. In January of this year, the visitor’s mother died and her Peverel Property and posessions are currently being handled by their solicitor in probate. In March, the Solicitor [...]

Comments (2)

A Classic Example of Peverel’s Tactics

Those that are not that familar with the way Peverel Group operate within the Property Management Sector, may be interested to read the following e-mail that we received from a TheTruthAboutSolitaire contributor. Good afternoon. Firstly, the website is brilliant – please keep up the good work!! Secondly… I’m at my wits end with County Estate Management. When I [...]

Comments (27)

Competitors Are Referring PPMG/SPM Clients to TTAS!

We hope that all of the recent technical difficulties experienced in the last few weeks are sorted and do apologise for the lack of Solitaire / Peverel related posts.  We trust you can all appreciate that our efforts have been focused on ensuring that TheTruthAboutSolitaire website was stable, before we re-commenced posting stories. Despite our technical problems, it [...]

Comments (4)

City Heights Update & Fortune 500

Residents from City Heights (victorious in one of the biggest LVT cases in the UK) have provided us with an update on how things are going following the LVT decision. Separate from the LVT decision the team running the City Heights LVT have been trying to trace and identify missing reserve funds for the six apartment blocks [...]

Comments (13)